Here's your post:

I was under the impression that I disagree with Berkeley on this matter. I'm wondering whether or not Locke argues that an unmoved mover is similar to the meaning of life. Does Locke really believe that ethics breaks down my conception of the collection of an object's properties? Camus believes that logic is not a reason for determinism. It seems to me that an idea is Pascal's Wager.

I was wondering if it is true that according to Descartes, personal identity might be like Skepticism. A rational argument might be a reason for daily life. A big part of the difference between Relativism and the collection of an object's properties is proven by responsibility, but religion proves my conception of existence.

Reload for more!